Beyond Tolerance: Globalization, Freedom, and Religious Pluralism

نویسنده

  • Douglas W. Shrader
چکیده

If “Globalization” is to mean something other than imposing a single set of uniform, unexamined, and unchallengeable ideas on the entire human race, we must find ways to incorporate concepts of difference, freedom, and religious pluralism. If we are to build a truly human and humane global community, we must rethink (i) human nature (especially as regards the age-old search for spiritual values and religious truths), (ii) the complex and often murky relationship between religion and culture, and (iii) competing, confusing, or ill-defined concepts of tolerance, diversity, and freedom. Because Globalization is often driven by economic engines that are blind to these considerations and values, we stand at a unique turning point in human history. Unchecked and unguided, this powerful but sightless form of Globalization threatens to eliminate religious and cultural practices of “less developed” countries. A rich history that stretches hundreds or thousands of years into the past may be wiped out in a single generation. For some, it is already too late. To avoid further cultural erosion of this sort, we must guard against two natural human inclinations: (i) religious conversion (converting the residents of “less developed” countries to the religions of the rich and powerful), and (ii) reinterpreting traditional practices of one culture in terms of concepts and categories characteristic of a different (more familiar) religion/culture. Acknowledging the need for principles of difference, freedom, and religious pluralism is the easy part. The hard part consists of two tasks: (i) deciding the specifics of those principles and (ii) formulating an effective plan that will lead to widespread adoption and practice without stifling difference and disagreement in the process. As a step in what I believe to be the right direction, this presentation proceeds from a series of reflections drawn from Classical Greece and Rome to an analysis and comparison of three very different models of religious tolerance and pluralism: those exemplified in India, Classical China, and the United States. Special consideration is given not only to the strengths and merits of the various models, but to their assumptions, liabilities, and drawbacks as well. 1 The issues that form the core of this paper are complex and controversial; to some, they may even seem intractable. Because a truly lasting solution requires consideration and discussion in a wide variety of international venues, this paper – even in its published form – represents a work-in-progress. Earlier versions have been presented at the International Society for the Comparative Study of Civilizations in St. Petersburg, Russia: “St. Petersburg in the Dialogue of Civilizations and Cultures of East and West” (September 2003), the East-West Center International Conference in Tokyo, Japan: “New Challenges For Building An Asia Pacific Community” (August 2004), and the Sixth World Congress of the International Society for Universal Dialogue in Helsinki, Finland: “Humanity At The Turning Point: Rethinking Nature, Culture, And Freedom” (July 2005). The author is grateful for the insights and perspectives offered by participants in each of those venues. Presentations in Russia and Japan were supported in part by a Faculty Development Award. Sincere appreciation is extended to SUNY Oneonta, especially Provost F. Daniel Larkin and Dean Michael Merilan.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Gotama Buddha and Religious Pluralism

Buddhism currently enjoys the reputation of being one of the leading voices in a chorus that sings the praises of religious tolerance and perhaps even of pluralism. It is open to question, however, whether this reputation is deserved. The purpose of the present article is to examine whether the teachings of classical Buddhism have a contribution to make to the jubilation over religious pluralis...

متن کامل

e-Learning Theories with Emphasis on Independence Theory

Introduction: The basis of distance learning rests on the independence of the learner. The independent learning-teaching process is an educational system in which each learner is independent and separated from their teacher by time and place. Hence the present study seeks to examine E-learning Theories in general, but focuses on Independence Theory. Methods: The present study was conducte...

متن کامل

Aspects of reductionism in religious studies

  Reductionism is a major methodological mistake in research and generally in thought; because it can pose as an obstacle to comprehensive views about the researched issue. This issue is more tangible in religious phenomena - due to the multidimensional entity of this subject – and can be more destructive. A researcher through focusing on one role and aspect of religion and concentrating on a ...

متن کامل

The Moral Virtue of Tolerance and Its Relationship in Liberalism and Religious Modernism in Iran

Background: Gentleness, ease and compromise with others cause the proper development of human emotions and in religious texts it is referred to as "tolerance". This moral virtue has a high importance and position among different schools and religious teachings, so the main question in this study was how the relationship between the moral virtues of tolerance in the school of liberalism with thi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008